One sided and lazy "journalism". He is not able to interview with some objectivity at all. 69 out of 71 found this helpful They sprinkle out some background information here and there throughout the episode, but it's so poorly done that you don't get a clear picture of what happened when and to whom. Avoid. The prisoners don't get a chance at all to tell their side of the story. Confessions Of A Serial Killer With Piers Morgan, Thursday, ITV, 9pm. Wasted potential of the series.Well, keep in mind:Dont ever cast in Rambo movie Leonardo di Caprio.. 76 out of 78 found this helpful Piers Morgan travels to Florida to sit down with Bernard Giles, who is serving a life sentence for killing five women over three months in 1973. 29 out of 31 found this helpful Could he remember the names of his victims? He is stamping on the hard and professional way of doing an interview and I really think that Netflix should stop sending this "documentary". Insted we have to suffer through Mr. Morgan asking loaded questions to all, not at all interested in anything these men offer or he himself offering an objective mindset. 53 out of 54 found this helpful I refuse to believe that Piers Morgan has a degree in journalism.
With such a bad teqnichue, he is also destroying it for others journalists. He doesn't listen, doesn't give the interviewees an opportunity to speak, repeats the same thing over and over, doesn't apply any thought to what he is doing. Piers says You're evil! Just to chat and piss them off? Man enters interview with Piers. Is he even a journalist? 149 out of 154 found this helpful 19 out of 19 found this helpful 60 out of 62 found this helpful Whats the point, very frustrating to watch.
Email us at tips @the-sun.co.uk …
95 out of 95 found this helpful However this was the worst show I've ever seen of this kind, Piers is not a interviewer, he doesn't know how to listen, he's biased and he don't know how to keep it to himself.
Why on earth does Piers Morgan go around calling himself a journalist? 19 out of 20 found this helpful Do you have a story for The Sun Online news team? Giles declined.
You are almost forced to take on the side of the serial killers because Piers is the most self righteous person, it is cringeworthy to watch. Find out more Piers Morgan just attacking these people and trying to put words in their mouth. Your interview style can be great for some things but this is not one of them.
It's one big bowl of bad journalism. Now, I am no interview or interrogation expert, but it feels obvious to even me that contantly interrupting your subject is not going to get you very far. 188 out of 190 found this helpful
It is a fine line that a journalist must toe when interviewing people of this caliber. Over a three-month period in 1973, he murdered five young women – all hitchhikers picked up on the highway near his Florida trailer park home.Time and again, Giles quietly stonewalled Morgan’s questions. Piers Morgan is a horrible interviewer. I'm a fan of these kinds of interviews and criminal cases, but this was the worst show ever. Two episodes in, and both killers claim innocence offering little insight into their own motives etc.
Starring: Piers Morgan,Bernard Giles.
Man convicted of brutal murder, serial murder, and here's the evidence. We pay for your stories! These are some of the worst "interviews" I've seen. The publicity for this show said: “Piers draws fascinating psychological revelations from Bernard Giles at every turn… and gains a powerful, vivid insight into the mind of a murderer.” The trouble was, he didn’t.He asked the emotionless Giles to look down the camera and apologise to the victims’ families. The background information was interesting but to see footage of the men walking off camera was a waste of time. Serial killers=bad, so, Piers telling killers that they are bad means Piers=good. Afraid not you goddamn donkey. I never write reviews, but Piers has irritated me so much with his interviewing technique that I had to write one. 135 out of 138 found this helpful Not many facts shown, and a lot assumptions. All he knows is sensationalism and his attempt to recreate it here is a colossal failure. He recalled first feeling the incipient thrill of sexual violence as a six-year-old boy, while playing a game with his female neighbour.
Just because Piers shows how easy it is to twist facts.
Watch all you want.
“Hard to describe.” How was he functioning in everyday life? Terrible. 23 out of 23 found this helpful I'm a forensic psychologist and I usually watch those kind of documentaries to study cases. 2019 GUIDANCE 44m British Films. This show is utterly one-sided and makes no effort to uncover anything.
34 out of 35 found this helpful We spend more time listening to Piers Morgan than to what seem to be some talkative potential serialkillers, that could have provided us an insight to these cases or to these mens mentality. ... Confessions of a Serial Killer with Piers Morgan, review: a documentary that's more damp squib than killer revelations 1 And he is destroys a golden opportunity to understand the mind of these killers.
“Access.” How did killing feel? Yes, Netflix should be ashamed of itself for showing this crap. Piers Morgan simply doesn't have the skills to interview these people.
Now if that wasn't the point of your interviews then I'm not sure what was. You wanna see how it's done just ask me, I would love to show you how it's done! Morgan was reduced to waving a photograph of Giles’s daughter, who he hadn’t seen for 45 years, under his nose, asking how he’d feel if she was raped and murdered. Man claims he's not guilty. His interviewing technique (not that there is one) is so annoying that you can't watch the show. This is not a show for the history books. Confessions of a Serial Killer with Piers Morgan. Through intense prison interviews, Piers Morgan revisits the crimes of three convicted serial killers and learns more about their motives. Neither happened and will never happen with your interviewing style.