However, for the US, the designs remained on the drawing board. Heavy cruiser development was steadied between World War I and World War II by the terms of the Washington Naval Treaty and successor treaties and conferences.
[KNTAI] large cruiser large cruisers Alaska Alaska-class large cruiser, or battlecruiser Philippines'' (CB-4) Puerto Rico'' (CB-5) Samoa'' (CB-6) The Alaska class was a class of six large cruisers ordered before World War II for the United States Navy.wikipedia. The forerunner to the Alaska class design got its start as a result of the introduction of the German “pocket battleships.” Well armed and with a respectable speed, they posed a threat to merchant vessels. The idea for a large cruiser class originated in the early 1930s when the U.S. Navy sought to counter The new class was officially funded in September 1940 along with a plethora of other ships as a part of the Yet another drastic change was considered during the "carrier panic" of late 1941. Shares Facebook Twitter The warships of the Alaska class are perhaps one of the more confusing ships ever put to sea by the United States. 97 Related Articles She was the first of two ships of her class to be completed, followed only by Guam; four other ships were ordered but were not completed before the end of the war. The Alaskas did have high speed, but the Germans superior armor speed would mean the Scharnhorst could easily decide how the engagement would be fought.Getting chased around the rafters of the Wiki OfficeGetting chased around the rafters of the Wiki Office Designed solely for the Alaska -class, they took advantage of ballistic technology being implemented in the early 1940s. ON another forum, it is the most dangerous ship to mention, as it basically cues a massive storm of:The alaska was Americas response to the ten GUn heavy cruisers of Japan. They were officially classed as large cruisers (CB), but others have regarded them as battlecruisers. She's intermediary between battleships and cruisers, but that's not what a battlecruiser is supposed to be.They had a range of 42 km at elevation 40 degrees,for sake of completeness - range at elevation of 30 degrees was 36 kmBehind the belt there was a heavy scarp 105 mm thick at about 65 degrees laid backto reach vitalia of the ship any ordnance that penetrates the belt has to penetrate the scarp toothe main armored deck was 80 mm additional there was the upper deck of 50 mm wich was also ballistical relevantfor high angle attack this divided arrangement acts as later so called spaced armor. The Alaska class consisted of six cruisers ordered before World War II for the United States Navy. The initial impetus for the Alaska design came from the deployments of Germany's so-called pocket batt The Alaska class were the great white elephants of the US Navy.
The Alaska class was a class of six large cruisers ordered before World War II for the United States Navy.They were officially classed as large cruisers (CB), but others have regarded them as battlecruisers.They were all named after territories or insular areas of the United States, signifying their intermediate status between larger battleships and smaller heavy and light cruisers. You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section. Effective thickness of horizontal protection (50 mm upperdeck + 80 mm main armor deck) was about 150 mm (at magazines the thickness of the main armor deck was 105 mm)Technically there was a weakness in the protection scheme, as the upper citadelarmor was only 45 mm thick; this thickness possibly did not ensure decapping of the 12" AP-shell of Alaska, allowing for attack of the main armor deck by a possibly undeformed/undamaged projectiles.Its not just the Alaska class that has a slightly confused designation...guess it shows you that the ship designations are not set in stone and are more dependent on the intended role than the armor/armament/size of the vesselIts not just the Alaska class that has a slightly confused designation...guess it shows you that the ship designations are not set in stone and are more dependent on the intended role than the armor/armament/size of the vesselThe armor on both is actually not that impressive, both able to penetrate each other's side quite handily, however the Scharnhorst 28cm SK/ C34 is unable to penetrate the Alaska's deck and top turret at all ranges whilst the heavy shots of the Alaska will penetrate the Scharnhorst's deck at all ranges up to 38,500 yards. See Worth, 305.Sources vary greatly on just how many people composed the complement of the ship.With only a very few exceptions, U.S. battleships were named for states, Alaska and Hawaii were "insular areas" of the United States at the time; they acceded to the Union as the forty-ninth and fiftieth States in 1959.Japan actually developed plans for two of the super cruisers in 1941, though it was mostly in response to the new A similar proposal was made to convert the uncompleted Dulin, Jr.,Robert O.; Garzke, Jr.; William H. (1976).
Trials, however, were disappointing, Alaska making only …